CQH Working Paper No.0018 | Posted:  2026-10-20

Top‑Down Monitoring or Top‑down Encroachment? How Centralized Tax Administration Undermined State Capacity in China

Authors

  • Yu Hao Peking University
  • Kevin Zhengcheng Liu Zhejiang University

Keywords:

state capacity, fiscal capacity, tax administration, taxation, China

Abstract

Centralized tax administration with top‑down monitoring is regarded as a key element of the modern fiscal state. However, centralized administration can also introduce new agency problems for the monitors and create distortions across levels of the bureaucratic hierarchy. This paper studies how a fiscal administration reform aimed at monitoring local taxation can have unintended consequences on state capacity in late 18th‑century China, using a novel dataset on tax collection constructed from administrative archives. We exploit predetermined variation across counties in exposure to the reform, which imposed formal oversight on county taxation by provincial treasuries. We find that the reform had a negative effect on tax collection. The decline in tax collection can be explained by a top‑down encroachment mechanism: the reform created greater scope for monitors to withhold and misappropriate county funds. Such intergovernmental fiscal encroachment undermined local tax enforcement capacity and distorted county bureaucrats’ incentives to underreport and embezzle revenue. We provide a range of evidence consistent with these causal chains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References (82)

Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2019. The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. New York: Penguin Press.

Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. 2005. “Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth.” In Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1, edited by Philippe Aghion and Steven N. Durlauf, 385–472. Elsevier.

Aman-Rana, Shan, Clement Minaudier, and Sandip Sukhtankar. 2023. “Informal Fiscal Systems in Developing Countries.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 31793.

Aneja, Abhay, and Guo Xu. 2024. “Strengthening State Capacity: Civil Service Reform and Public Sector Performance during the Gilded Age.” American Economic Review 114 (8): 2352–2387.

Bandiera, Oriana, Michael Carlos Best, Adnan Qadir Khan, and Andrea Prat. 2021. “The Allocation of Authority in Organizations: A Field Experiment with Bureaucrats.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 136 (4): 2195–2242.

Becker, Sascha O., Andreas Ferrara, Eric Melander, and Luigi Pascali. 2025. “Wars, Taxation and Representation: Evidence from Five Centuries of German History.” Journal of the European Economic Association, jvaf019.

Bertrand, Marianne, Robin Burgess, Arunish Chawla, and Guo Xu. 2020. “The Glittering Prizes: Career Incentives and Bureaucrat Performance.” Review of Economic Studies 87 (2): 626–655.

Besley, Timothy, and Torsten Persson. 2009. “The Origins of State Capacity: Property Rights, Taxation, and Politics.” American Economic Review 99 (4): 1218–1244.

Besley, Timothy, and Torsten Persson. 2013. “Taxation and Development.” In Handbook of Public Economics, Vol. 5, 51–110. Elsevier.

Besley, Timothy, Robin Burgess, Adnan Khan, and Guo Xu. 2022. “Bureaucracy and Development.” Annual Review of Economics 14: 397–424.

Downloads

How to Cite

Hao, Yu, and Kevin Zhengcheng Liu. 2026. “Top‑Down Monitoring or Top‑down Encroachment? How Centralized Tax Administration Undermined State Capacity in China”. CQH Working Paper Series. https://aal.hku.hk/index.php/cqh/preprint/view/wp0018.